No one is more anti-smoking than an ex-smoker.
Even though back in the day I smoked the cowboy killers, (yes, I chain smoked the cowboy killers) today I find few of other people’s habits more annoying. The exception to that would be Jerry’s uncanny ability to spot either puke or shit combined with his complete unwillingness to actually clean up said puke, shit or other noxious mess.
On one hand, since cigarettes are legal and the government makes money on them, people should be allowed to smoke up- anywhere and everywhere- should they so desire. On the other, I am not a fan of having my airspace polluted by some jackwagon’s cig smoke.
I know it’s too complicated for Jerry. But there may be hope for others.
The above illustration doesn’t mention the damned cellophanes, but then again most smokers don’t just toss the foil and cellophane on the floor to clog up the vacuum cleaner, either. No matter how you scour the floor for cellophanes, there’s at least one that avoids detection and ends up clogging the vacuum cleaner, which begs one question and one statement.
1. What’s the bloody point of having a vacuum cleaner if you have to pick up half the shit on the floor before you vacuum so it doesn’t clog the machine?
2. Jerry was raised by wolves, which is why there is unauthorized detritus on the floor that shouldn’t be there to begin with. I should be grateful he knows how to wipe his ass.
I think some of the really weird Victorian artwork actually is drug-inspired. I mean, this dude was even impaired in his fashion choices. Elton John wouldn’t even wear this ensemble. When alcohol, opium and God only knows what else were readily available in just about every patent medicine in existence, I’m sure there were plenty of guys who wore bad clothes and thought they were riding around on (stoned) giant white pigeons.
I’m thinking duct tape would have kept this poor dead kid’s head up for the pic.
I’m assuming the little girl in the very front of this pic is dead by the vacuous stare and the way her head is flopped over. However, her mother is hanging on to her hair in a manner that would make an old-time Catholic mother proud. The expression on the mother’s face seems to be one of those “You will sit still dammit,” expressions rather than a mournful pose. Perhaps the two boys in the background were getting on her nerves, or maybe she was peeved because the dead one kept on flopping over. Maybe she grabbed the dead kid by the hair just to keep her steady in one place.
I have to wonder how many child deaths buried in the overwhelmingly high infant mortality rate of the Victorian era were actually inflicted by the mothers?
It would be easy enough to cover up one’s crime. Lots of kids died, and died suddenly from everything from typhoid to a good old fashioned case of the runs. An autopsy of that time – should anyone insist one be conducted- probably wouldn’t reveal poisoning or suffocation.
emetic:
adjective
1.causing vomiting, as a medicinal substance.
Okay, that’s your most hideous dead Victorian baby photo yet. Yig!
I’m an ex-smoker, but not a nut about it. I’m a big believer in smokers’ rights, as well as the right of any individual to put whatever substance into their bodies they so choose. I mean it. Personally, I’m thinking of the sweet, sweet cheeba, but if someone wants to shoot up with bleach, more power to them. Seriously, someone who thinks that’s a good idea probably shouldn’t live long enough to breed.
I had to ask, which baby was more disturbing- the one where the mom is grabbing her by the hair, or the one with the bad fix job on the eyeballs? Inquiring minds want to know.
Smokers’ rights end when their smoke invades my airspace. Other than that, I believe that substance abusers should be free to kill themselves with their drug of choice, thus clearing out the gene pool and eliminating the wars over drug supply.